From a National Weather Service (NWS) source this morning:
"The offices in Wichita and Dodge City went down 'hard' since about 11:30pm last night. This is the third time in the past year. [Note: There were severe thunderstorms near Dodge City last night.] The NWS office in Goodland backed up Dodge City and Topeka backed up Wichita.
I've told you that failed communications systems with no backup in each office has become an all-too-frequent problem. While each office has primary, secondary and tertiary backups, it has the potential to put a severe strain on the office providing backup, especially if they are short-staffed.
This has become a more frequent occurrence since the NWS stopped supporting the VSat satellite system each office had until last year. FYI: that was before the Trump Administration came into office."
"NOAA operates a $0.5B/year program [$500 million] that is literally called the Cooperative Institute Program (https://ci.noaa.gov/) with express connection between NOAA and nearly 100 Universities representing 33 states across the Nation."
The bottom line that, while I am opposed to the way the Trump Administration has proceeded (so far) with NOAA, major changes were desperately needed! It is appalling that NOAA always seems to have money for pork ($60 million example, here) while its field offices are -- literally -- falling apart. Keep in mind that it is the field offices that issue tornado warnings, blizzard warnings and the essential products that people associate with the NWS and NOAA.
Late Breaking Story Since the Above Was Posted:The NWS is making crucial upper air launches optional at many of its field offices! The memo is below.
There are good reasons to believe this is related to the original story (above) -- far too many communications issues forcing short-handed offices to go into backup mode for a second office that has lost communications. While NOAA needs reform, the Trump Administration's haphazard personnel movements have made it worse.
This blog, for years, has advocated more use of automated weather balloon launchers. See brief video below.
We wouldn't be in this mess if we had a National Disaster Review Board or had the President or Commerce Secretary set up a small, trusted group of advisors to guide what should be cut and what should be kept.
Bottom line, NOAA has always had money for porkbut its field offices are literally falling apart. And, it is the field offices that issue the tornado warnings, blizzard warnings and other critical products upon which the public depends. NOAA desperately needs reform.
Happy to add under my name, Al Peterlin. Agree NOAA has always had funds for pork. And has to my knowledge managed to under fund operational or useful programs of NWS from the Ag program that was destroyed to the original climate observation sites and so much more.
More heavy rain (snow in the mountains) forecast. Rains have already begun over the southern two-thirds of the state. See 3:15pm radar below. In addition, there is small risk of a tornado, especially tomorrow morning, in coastal areas of Southern California, shown in dark green.
The title of this essay is from a press release that indirectly "blames the victim." The author is Sedgwick County Emergency Management regarding a fatal tornado that occurred just north of Wichita at 1:14 this morning. The tornado was rated EF-2 ("strong") intensity. I believe the wording is unfortunate as discussed below. Photo: KAKE.com. Note that with a basement, as little as seconds to dash down the stairs might have been sufficient to avoid injury. In what has increasingly and unfortunately become the norm in tornado situations, no NWS tornado warning was issued even though: Rotation was depicted on radar Radar shows lofted debris People from outside the NWS are observing tornadoes and bringing them to NWS's and the public's attention. I want to be clear: the tornado formed practically on top of the home and there was probably no way to have warned in time to help the man killed. But there is absolutely no reason a tornado warning could not have bee...
This past Friday, we had a great example of how a meteorologist can tell the difference between side-lobes (a false echo that mimics a tornado's circulation on radar) and one indicating a tornado is forming or in progress. I'm going to walk you through it so young meteorologists, in a similar case, won't make the mistake of mistaking side lobes for a tornado. This case was in north central Texas on February 2nd. I'm using the Abilene/Sweetwater WSR-88D and the software is RadarScope. When I draw on one panel of the screen, it shows up on the other in the same place, so the measurements are about as exact as any in meteorology. The Thunderstorm Cluster, 4:24pm Above is a cluster of thunderstorms with the two storms with arrows starting to transition to supercells. We already have the northern storm (just south of Aspermont) moving north northeast. In a situation like this, the storm will likely be "a hailer" -- meaning it is likely to produce hail, possibly ...
Happy to add under my name, Al Peterlin. Agree NOAA has always had funds for pork. And has to my knowledge managed to under fund operational or useful programs of NWS from the Ag program that was destroyed to the original climate observation sites and so much more.
ReplyDelete