Per the Washington Post, Federal District Judge Sara Hill determined this is "indiscriminate mass surveillance" -- what many of us concerned about our Constitutional rights have said all along. I believe the threshold for a warrant should be higher than usual because these cameras are wrong 71% of the time! We have already had multiple people jailed for a week or longer ... one for 30 days! ... because of Flock's incorrect data and lazy police work. Judges should be asking the question, "How do you know the Flock data is correct?" with the burden of proof on the agency requesting the warrant. It is a sad commentary on today's police forces, which take oaths to "support and uphold the Constitution," love these things.