C'mon, National Weather Service (Modified)

By -
Why isn't a blizzard watch in effect in South Dakota?

It turns out that is a valid question, but it was posed to the wrong people. I apologize to the NWS in Rapid City. 

It turns out that National Weather Service headquarters eliminated the blizzard watch product as part of a (my opinion) misguided product "simplification."
There are lots of things that should be simplified in the NWS. For example, I think "advisories" should completely go away. But, differentiating a blizzard from an ordinary "winter storm" isn't one of them!

So, the NWS in Rapid City could not have issued a blizzard watch. 

I was also misled by the blizzard watch still being in the product list at Pivotal Weather (below) and by the fact it is still listed at Wikipedia.
 

I wish to thank Jon Porter of AccuWeather for providing me with the correct info. 

NWS headquarters needs rethink the blizzard watch. I also believe it needs to add an "ice storm watch."


[original text below]

The National Weather Service office in Rapid City, SD, which has forecast responsibility for the southwest part of that state, wrote at 2:25pm MST:
  • Confidence in heavy snow and [high] wind very high
  • ...this would support blizzard conditions.
  • Snow amounts...on the South Dakota plains should be in the 10-20 inch range, with 6-12 inches possible from NE Wyoming into NW South Dakota. 12-24+ inches are still possible in the northern Black Hills and northern foothills. [the 24+" refers to total snowfall, not to drifting]
Okay, fine. The Rapid City NWS is expecting a crippling blizzard. I agree with every word of this. But, why doesn't their forecast match their words?! If they believe a major blizzard is going to occur, why haven't they issued a blizzard watch or blizzard warning?
Instead, there is a vast "winter storm watch" that is rather uninformative. For example, in Minnesota, the winter storm watch is for freezing rain and ice conditions. In South Dakota, it means blizzard. In Montana, it means just a couple of inches of snow. 

The NWS in Cheyenne has issued a blizzard warning (orange) and a winter storm warning (pink). 

The NWS's own "impact index" (below) says, "expect considerable disruption to daily life." The values in SD are the same as in the blizzard warning area. 

I cannot think of a single reason why adjacent parts of western South Dakota are not under a blizzard watch or warning, except for the inconsistency between NWS offices -- which is a lousy reason. People need time to plan for a storm of this power. A glance that the forecast map doesn't provide the "pay attention!" message it needs to provide, especially since different preparations are needed for ice versus a blizzard.

That is an advantage of using a service like AccuWeather: consistency. 

But, the NWS can and should do better than this when a major threat to safety and economic loss exists. 

Do better, National Weather Service!


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Hilary's Forecast Path Shifts West; Updated 9:20am PDT

By -
Image
The forecast path of the center of Hilary has shifted a bit to the west. This increases the threat to the Southland, especially in terms of flooding.  Rainfall Note the heavy rains are forecast for Los Angeles County. Serious flash flooding may result. Because the forecast path has shifted to the west, that increases the threat of serious flooding in Los Angeles County north into Yosemite and the southern Sierra. It lessens the threat in Utah and western Arizona. While the threat of widespread flooding in Utah and Arizona lessens, note that some thunderstorms with localized heavy rain show up on the map.  In Nevada, the more western path increases the risk of serious flooding around Mt Charleston and into the central part of the state.  Here is the updated  (9am PDT) flash flood risk map. Wind There are already about 40,000 people without power in California, mostly in the center of the state.  The maps above are the peak gusts forecasted with the storm. The highest winds, in general,
Read more

Dangerous Travel Conditions - People Reportedly Stranded

By -
Image
-- Note, more current info available. Scroll up. --- Updated Information as of 8am PDT You are risking your life if you attempt to travel through the purple area.  While the rain has not begun in coastal California, I would urge you to use this time to make any preparations. Power outages have occurred already in southeast California. Here is the latest radar as of 7:55am PDT. As of 6:40am PDT , the radar indicates moderate to heavy rain falling over desert areas of Southern California and far western Arizona (click to enlarge).  Rainfall amounts for the 24 hours ending at 7am PDT show more than two inches have already fallen. There are reports from reliable sources that roads are already washed out and that people are stranded in isolated parts of the desert.  Below is a high-resolution computer model's rainfall forecast from 5am PDT to 11pm PDT Sunday. More than a foot of additional rain is forecast to fall. This will lead to catastrophic flooding.  Here is a map of current watc
Read more

Update on Tornado and Wind Potential; 12 Noon PDT

By -
Image
There was at least one tornado and at least one funnel cloud yesterday.  --- original forecast --- Hilary (the swirly symbol) continues to move NNW paralleling the coast of Baja California, Mexico. The area outlined in red has a significant risk of tornadoe s the rest of the afternoon.  Below is a list of peak wind gusts so far.  Peak winds may increase farther north as the afternoon progresses.  Addition at 12 noon PDT: Sure enough, winds have increased.  Note: If you are in the San Diego area, I recommend not  traveling east on I-8. Heavy rains may cause flash flooding that will involve the highway. 
Read more