Good morning, everyone. For unexpected reasons, I am not able to write new content this morning, so I am moving this up by one day. Hope you find it interesting.  I simply can't imagine why anyone reads The New York Times.  So many of its global warming stories are just wrong.  Dead from weather-related disasters have decreased, not increased. See the graph below.  The above puts the lie to the story regardless of the additional fact that weather-related disasters and subsequent deaths are not decreasing due to climate (discussion here ). I suppose there will always be people who want to signal their virtue by reading the Times  but I can't imagine people read it for quality climate journalism.