Those who follow me on Twitter saw that question posted to me last week. It is a fair question.
Most of the reason I don't post pro-CAGW (catastrophic anthropogenic [human-caused] global warming) information more often is that the science on the pro-catastrophic side is very weak.
But, the better response to the scientists' question is in what I do not post. Below is a clever, wonderful
That said, I could see where this (invisible) censoring might lead to the incorrect impression I don't have high standards for what goes onto this blog or that I run only pro-skeptical science. That isn't correct.