Tuesday, February 3, 2015

Good News About Global Warming

From today's Wall Street Journal,

The latest study from the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change found that in the previous 15 years temperatures had risen 0.09 degrees Fahrenheit. The average of all models expected 0.8 degrees. So we’re seeing about 90% less temperature rise than expected.
Facts like this are important because a one-sided focus on worst-case stories is a poor foundation for sound policies. Yes, Arctic sea ice is melting faster than the models expected. But models also predicted that Antarctic sea ice would decrease, yet it is increasing. Yes, sea levels are rising, but the rise is not accelerating—if anything, two recent papers, one by Chinese scientists published in the January 2014 issue of Global and Planetary Change, and the other by U.S. scientists published in the May 2013 issue of Coastal Engineering, have shown a small decline in the rate of sea-level increase.
We are often being told that we’re seeing more and more droughts, but a study published last March in the journal Nature actually shows a decrease in the world’s surface that has been afflicted by droughts since 1982. 
Hurricanes are likewise used as an example of the “ever worse” trope. If we look at the U.S., where we have the best statistics, damage costs from hurricanes are increasing—but only because there are more people, with more-expensive property, living near coastlines. If we adjust for population and wealth, hurricane damage during the period 1900-2013 decreased slightly.
The author, a well-credentialed environmentalist, goes on to say,
At the U.N. climate conference in Lima, Peru, in December, attendees were told that their countries should cut carbon emissions to avoid future damage from storms like typhoon Hagupit, which hit the Philippines during the conference, killing at least 21 people and forcing more than a million into shelters. Yet the trend for landfalling typhoons around the Philippines has actually declined since 1950, according to a study published in 2012 by the American Meteorological Society’s Journal of Climate. Again, we’re told that things are worse than ever, but the facts don’t support this.
This is important because if we want to help the poor people who are most threatened by natural disasters, we have to recognize that it is less about cutting carbon emissions than it is about pulling them out of poverty.
Amen, amen!!


  1. Great stuff Mike - just be aware that the full WSJ article is behind their paywall. You need a WSJ subscription to read it.

  2. Mike,

    You say that Bjorn Lomborg is a "well credentialed environmentalist". When I look at his credentials, I see degrees in Political Science and a lecturer position in Statistics, but no Physical Science, Meteorology or Climatology degrees. I have also read several pretty well researched articles that pull apart Mr. Lomborg's recent editorial.

    P.S. Although I somehow got to the original WSJ article.. you can read the full article on alternative websites such as this:


  3. Statistics is good background for environmentalism. His credentials are not good for climate science.

    As for reading the article, just Google: lomborg+wsj+climate+alarmism . You don't need a subscription.


Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.