Supreme Court Rules Against Global Warming Case
With a hat tip to Watts Up With That, here is news that the U.S. Supreme Court has refused to hear a frivolous law suit blaming the damage from Hurricane Katrina on global warming. The case in a nutshell,
In Ned Comer et al. vs. Murphy Oil USA et al., a group of Mississippi property owners alleged that greenhouse gas emissions of Murphy Oil USA—through more than 100 oil, coal and chemical companies—contributed to climate change and furthered the property damage caused by Hurricane Katrina in 2005.
In Ned Comer et al. vs. Murphy Oil USA et al., a group of Mississippi property owners alleged that greenhouse gas emissions of Murphy Oil USA—through more than 100 oil, coal and chemical companies—contributed to climate change and furthered the property damage caused by Hurricane Katrina in 2005.
Comments
Post a Comment